home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=93TT0766>
- <title>
- Dec. 13, 1993: The Arts & Media:Theater
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1993
- Dec. 13, 1993 The Big Three:Chrysler, Ford, and GM
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- THE ARTS & MEDIA, Page 82
- Theater
- Family Feuds
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>Frank Gilroy revisits his 1964 hit, The Subject Was Roses
- </p>
- <p>By William A. Henry III
- </p>
- <p> When playwright Frank D. Gilroy made his Broadway debut in
- 1964 with The Subject Was Roses, winning the Tony, Pulitzer
- and New York Drama Critics Circle awards for best play, he seemed
- to be starting a glittering career. But he has never come close
- to that glory since. Presumably that is why he has returned
- to the Roses characters in Any Given Day, his first play in
- 14 years to reach Broadway. The new work is worthy enough, with
- more characters and a richer plot than Roses, and is handsomely
- mounted and capably performed by a cast including Sada Thompson
- in her first Broadway appearance since 1972.
- </p>
- <p> Alas, the competent production only underscores the root of
- Gilroy's problem: he is writing a no-longer-fashionable form,
- family melodrama, and is unable--as indeed, he was unable
- even in Roses, for all its acute observation--to invest middle-class
- conflict with enough poetry or subtext to have it mean more
- than the surface struggle. This kind of storytelling is now
- done by TV movies of the week.
- </p>
- <p> Any Given Day takes place a few years before Roses. The central
- characters were offstage presences in that play: a manipulative
- matriarch (Thompson in peak form) and her mentally and physically
- handicapped grandson. The new work also concerns itself with
- two marriages, one contemplated and one in danger of breaking
- up, plus tuberculosis, a son's going off to World War II, and
- the matriarch's claims to foretell the future.
- </p>
- <p> The prevailing mood is wistful. The Roses family, now secondary
- characters, uninterestingly prefigure what will happen to them.
- Indeed, only one supporting actor, Andrew Robinson, as a good
- but geeky prospective in-law, gets below the surface. The whole
- experience elicits respect for the author and compassion for
- his people, but not much pleasure.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-